ArticleBMJ open2026
Exploring how patients, caregivers and clinicians experience pain across therapeutic areas in Italy: a multi-centre narrative medicine project.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite increased awareness of its multi-dimensional nature, pain remains often underestimated, and its management across different therapeutic areas remains complex. A patient-centred approach is needed to bridge the gap between clinical assessment and individual experience. This project aimed to explore the pain experience across different therapeutic areas through narrative medicine (NM). DIAMOND, the project name, is not an acronym but a symbol meant to shed light on physical and mental pain.
methodsDIAMOND involved 19 Italian centres and collected narratives from patients experiencing chronic pain, epilepsy, Gram-positive infections or depression, as well as from their caregivers and treating clinicians. Narratives and socio-demographic data were collected anonymously via a dedicated platform. Narratives were analysed using MAXQDA (VERBI Software, Berlin, Germany), applying NM classifications and content analysis; metaphors used by participants to describe pain were also analysed.
resultsNarratives were collected from 64 patients and 56 caregivers; 20 clinicians contributed 40 parallel charts, all of which were included in the analysis. Pain emerged as a deeply embodied and emotional experience, often described through metaphors of darkness, oppression and distortion. At diagnosis, fear, anxiety and disbelief predominated; however, over time, some participants reported acceptance and resilience. Caregivers described significant emotional, relational and economic burdens, often reporting feelings of helplessness and a sense of responsibility. Clinicians presented more progressive narratives, often focusing on technical aspects of care. The narratives revealed a perceptual gap between patients, caregivers and clinicians, especially regarding the emotional meaning of illness and treatment. The narrative process was seen as beneficial by most participants, supporting inner reflection.
conclusionThis pioneering NM initiative mapped the lived experience of pain across multiple conditions, incorporating the perspectives of patients, caregivers and clinicians. NM proved essential in identifying unmet needs and emotional drivers of care, fostering more empathetic, patient-centred approaches in pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.