ArticleBMJ open2026
Implementation barriers and facilitators to a vocational rehabilitation intervention after traumatic injury (ROWTATE) in the UK: qualitative interviews with key stakeholders.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore barriers and facilitators to implementing the ROWTATE vocational rehabilitation intervention and identify lessons for future service delivery.
designQualitative interview implementation study embedded within the development and evaluation of a complex health intervention, guided by the UK Medical Research Council framework.
settingNational Health Service (NHS) major trauma services in England. The ROWTATE intervention included early vocational assessment lasting up to 12 months, case management, employer engagement and coordinated multidisciplinary support between occupational therapists and clinical psychologists. The intervention was delivered via hybrid models following COVID-19 adaptations.
participantsPurposively sampled stakeholders including patients, therapists, mentors, employers, carers, commissioners and primary care practitioners.
methods80 semistructured interviews were conducted remotely between March 2023 and June 2025 using topic guides informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Data were analysed using framework coding followed by reflexive thematic analysis to generate cross-cutting themes and implementation-focused recommendations.
resultsImplementation was shaped by six cross-cutting themes that acted as both barriers and facilitators depending on context. Stakeholders highlighted the importance of addressing diverse patient needs and outcomes through early, personalised support and case management. Remote delivery improved accessibility and flexibility but was most effective when combined with face-to-face contact to strengthen relationships and contextual understanding. Multidisciplinary occupational therapy and clinical psychology collaboration enabled holistic care, though required structured processes to overcome communication challenges. Mentoring provided essential professional development and mitigated isolation in remote roles, while employer engagement facilitated workplace adjustments and retention but was constrained by patients' reluctance to involve employers and by variable occupational health provision. Strategic buy-in from commissioners and clinical leaders was critical, with emphasis on robust outcome data and economic evidence to support sustainability.
conclusionsFindings inform strategies for embedding vocational rehabilitation within integrated care models and identify core components that should be protected to support implementation when scaling hybrid delivery (eg, mentoring and structured multidisciplinary team processes). The study also outlines scalable approaches to hybrid service delivery, workforce development and employer engagement, offering transferable lessons for health systems seeking to reduce economic inactivity and address post-trauma inequalities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN43115471.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.