Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42532490›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2026

Refolding of the Four Helical Fragments of Barstar on Gold Nanoparticles.

Xiaoran Zhang, Chenxi Lou, Jiewen Deng, Haifang Wang, Aoneng Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoran ZhangInstitute of Nanochemistry and Nanobiology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Chenxi LouInstitute of Nanochemistry and Nanobiology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Jiewen DengInstitute of Nanochemistry and Nanobiology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Haifang WangInstitute of Nanochemistry and Nanobiology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7660-2089
Aoneng CaoInstitute of Nanochemistry and Nanobiology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22071145National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The correct folding of proteins is a prerequisite for their biological functions, but the secret of protein folding is still not fully understood. Recently, a new theory of protein folding was proposed: the Confined Lowest Energy Fragment (CLEF) hypothesis, which can explain protein folding experiments well. According to the CLEF hypothesis, all proteins can be divided into independent folding units (CLEF fragments), which can even refold into their native conformation via suitable nanoparticle (NP)-peptide interactions. This opens the door to creating artificial proteins by restoring the native conformations and functions of protein fragments on NPs. To verify this prediction, herein, we demonstrate that peptides corresponding to the four helixes of the barstar protein, which are basically in a random coil conformation on their own, can refold into α-helixes on gold NPs (AuNPs) without their original neighboring fragments in barstar. Our results show that the seemingly indispensable long-range interactions within proteins, which are considered indispensable and mysterious, can be replaced by simple interactions with NPs, such as, Au─N bonds between the fragments and AuNPs. This study provides new evidence for the CLEF theory and adds a new tool to the toolbox for creating NP-based artificial proteins.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsGoldMetal NanoparticlesProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein FoldingProtein RefoldingProtein Structure, SecondaryBacterial Proteinsbarstar protein, Bacillus amyloliquefaciensGoldAu─N bondsConfined Lowest Energy Fragment hypothesisconformational reconstructiongold nanoparticlesprotein folding

Identifiers

PMID42532490
PMCPMC13423566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.