SynthesisApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026
Can executive functions be improved by playing board games across the lifespan? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Can executive functions be improved by playing board games across the lifespan? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Board games are usually played with other people across the lifespan. They seem to improve executive functions, which are psychological processes key to our daily lives. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to show whether board games could improve executive functions at different ages. At first, 5288 studies were found in four databases (Scopus, WOS, PsycINFO, and Medline). Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 16 studies were included in the meta-analytical analysis. In the systematic review, we especially found effects in verbal short-term memory in children. In addition, the meta-analysis showed significant results for visuospatial short-term memory in kindergarten and processing speed in older people. We also assessed heterogeneity and conducted a meta-regression analysis considering the risk of bias. High heterogeneity was observed in some meta-analyses. Overall, the results suggest that the current empirical evidence is not yet sufficient to support a strong recommendation for the use of board games to improve executive functions. However, the findings are promising and highlight the potential of board games as a cognitive intervention. Therefore, future well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the effectiveness of such interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.