ArticleDiabetes & vascular disease research
Relationship between non-O blood groups and microvascular risk in type 2 diabetes.
Article in Diabetes & vascular disease research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionABO groups impact macroangiopathy risk in T2D. It is unknown whether such modulation extends to microvascular complications.MethodSingle-centre cross-sectional study including 1,006 T2D patients.ResultsPrevalence of overall microangiopathy was 51%. No significant differences (ANOVA) were observed between ABO groups in terms of age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, hypertension, chronic kidney disease or diabetic foot. Insulin sensitivity and the hyperbolic HOMA product [BxS] were lower among non-O groups (-20% and -14%, respectively; p 0.001 and 0.013), while HbA1c and lifetime hyperglycaemia exposure were higher (+5% and +25%, respectively; p 0.006 and 0.002). Overall microangiopathy was more prevalent among non-O patients (+23%; p 0.001), as was neuropathy (+44%; p 0.005). Differences across ABO groups were significant for overall microangiopathy (p 0.009) and neuropathy (p 0.027) (ANOVA). In multivariate analysis, group A (vs O) was associated with overall microangiopathy (OR=1.62; 95%CI: 1.18-2.22; p 0.003) after adjustment for diabetes duration, HbA1c, smoking, remnant-C and hypertension.ConclusionT2D patients of blood group A have increased frequency of overall microangiopathy, regardless of other risk factors. Group O subjects exhibit better glucose homeostasis, with better insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. The ABO system therefore impacts both glucose homeostasis and microvascular susceptibility in T2D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.