Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42531286›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

TIG welding defect detection using ResNet and Random Forest.

Vu Quang Huy, Vu Minh Thuan, Hoang Van Huong, Tran Minh The Uyen, Van-Thuc Nguyen, Pham Son Minh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vu Quang HuyFaculty of Advanced Education, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, HCM City, Vietnam.
Vu Minh ThuanFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, HCM City, Vietnam.
Hoang Van HuongFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, HCM City, Vietnam.
Tran Minh The UyenFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, HCM City, Vietnam.
Van-Thuc NguyenFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, HCM City, Vietnam.
Pham Son MinhFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, HCM City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-2202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orbital TIG welding is critical in precision manufacturing, where weld defects can affect structural reliability. Manual inspection, analysis, and evaluation of welding defect images are complex because defect characteristics vary in shape, position, and size, making the process time-consuming. This study proposes a method that combines ResNet50 feature extraction with Random Forest classification to improve classification accuracy. A total of 3,219 weld image samples collected from controlled orbital TIG experiments were used for model training and evaluation and divided into four classes: normal weld, lack of fusion, overheating, and uneven weld. Using five-fold cross-validation, the method achieved an overall accuracy of 98% and demonstrated improved performance compared with CNN architectures (VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet50) and traditional machine learning approaches such as SVM and Random Forest. ResNet50 extracts hierarchical visual representations through deep residual connections, enabling automatic feature learning, while Random Forest performs the final classification with robustness against overfitting on high-dimensional features.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedWeldingClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksMachine LearningRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID42531286
PMCPMC13422830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.