ArticlePloS one2026
TIG welding defect detection using ResNet and Random Forest.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orbital TIG welding is critical in precision manufacturing, where weld defects can affect structural reliability. Manual inspection, analysis, and evaluation of welding defect images are complex because defect characteristics vary in shape, position, and size, making the process time-consuming. This study proposes a method that combines ResNet50 feature extraction with Random Forest classification to improve classification accuracy. A total of 3,219 weld image samples collected from controlled orbital TIG experiments were used for model training and evaluation and divided into four classes: normal weld, lack of fusion, overheating, and uneven weld. Using five-fold cross-validation, the method achieved an overall accuracy of 98% and demonstrated improved performance compared with CNN architectures (VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet50) and traditional machine learning approaches such as SVM and Random Forest. ResNet50 extracts hierarchical visual representations through deep residual connections, enabling automatic feature learning, while Random Forest performs the final classification with robustness against overfitting on high-dimensional features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.