Trial reportPloS one2026
Ultrasound-guided sacral multifidus plane block versus caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric hypospadias surgery: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHypospadias repair is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain in children. Caudal epidural block is traditionally considered the standard regional anesthetic technique for sub-umbilical pediatric surgeries; however, its duration of analgesia and potential adverse effects may be limited. The sacral multifidus plane block (SMPB) is a novel ultrasound-guided fascial plane technique that may provide prolonged analgesia with fewer complications. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided sacral multifidus plane block versus caudal epidural block in children undergoing hypospadias repair. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial included 30 children aged 1-5 years (ASA I-II) scheduled for hypospadias repair. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either SMPB (n = 15) or caudal block (n = 15), using 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was time to first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included postoperative FLACC pain scores, total rescue analgesic consumption, intraoperative fentanyl requirements, hemodynamic variables, and block-related complications. Pain was assessed for 24 hours postoperatively.
resultsDemographic and intraoperative characteristics were comparable between groups. Time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the SMPB group compared with the caudal group (14.8 ± 3.6 vs 9.3 ± 4.2 hours, p = 0.004). FLACC scores were significantly lower in the SMPB group at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively (p = 0.019 and p = 0.001, respectively). Total diclofenac consumption was lower in the SMPB group (0.40 ± 0.20 mg/kg vs 0.70 ± 0.24 mg/kg, p = 0.010). Intraoperative fentanyl requirements and hemodynamic parameters were similar. No major complications were observed.
conclusionUltrasound-guided sacral multifidus plane block provides longer-lasting postoperative analgesia and reduces rescue analgesic requirements compared with caudal epidural block in pediatric hypospadias surgery, with a comparable safety profile. SMPB may represent a reliable alternative to caudal block for postoperative pain management in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.