ArticlePloS one2026
Parental perspectives of prenatal counseling and decision making for termination or hospice birth due to fetal congenital heart defects.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate perspectives of counseling and decision making among birthing parents who chose termination or hospice birth due to a fetal congenital heart defect (CHD).
methodsQualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with birthing parents who chose either termination or hospice birth due to severe fetal CHD. Participants were recruited from a purposive sample of those who received multidisciplinary counseling at a tertiary congenital heart surgical center between 2019-2023. Thematic analysis was conducted in five stages, using an integrated deductive-inductive approach.
resultsIn total, 20 individuals were eligible; 10 completed interviews. Identified themes were categorized in two domains: Experiences During Counseling and Individual Factors Affecting Decision Making. Themes in the first domain included: areas for improvement during counseling, perceived strengths of counseling, patient attributes affecting counseling, and views on provider recommendations. Themes in the second domain included: emotions affecting decision making, value for reproductive autonomy, family factors, internal factors, outside input, and desire for resources.
conclusionsIn this study, birthing parents who chose termination or hospice for fetal CHD appreciated information extending beyond clinical outcomes to include family and financial impacts. Their value for reproductive autonomy reflects the need for clinicians to gain skills in empathetic and neutral counseling of all management options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.