ArticlePloS one2026
Educational strategies to improve health literacy for people with type 2 diabetes in low socio-economic communities: A realist review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionType 2 diabetes (T2D) has emerged among the top ten causes of disability and mortality worldwide. Health literacy is crucial for effective self-management to reduce the burden associated with T2D. Studies have reported the effectiveness of educational strategies for improving health literacy to promote good health and well-being. However, contextual factors influence the effectiveness of these strategies. Therefore, this paper intends to explain how and why context shapes the mechanisms through which educational strategies work to improve health literacy for adults with type 2 diabetes in low socioeconomic communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Theory-driven realist review methods will explain how and why contexts activate different mechanisms through which educational strategies work to produce intended or unintended outcomes in low socioeconomic communities. The following five steps of realist review, which are non-linear and iterative, will be undertaken: (i) Define the scope of the review and locate existing theories on educational strategies to improve health literacy, (ii) Develop the initial programme theories, (iii) Search for evidence, (iv) Select papers and appraise, and (v) Extract data and synthesis. The following databases will be searched, but not limited to, PubMed, Education Resource Information Centre (ERIC), and PsycINFO. Papers will be selected based on relevance, richness, and rigour. Data extraction will follow both inductive and deductive approaches. The Intervention-Context-Actor-Mechanism Outcome (ICAMO) configurations will be utilised to analyse and synthesise data using retroductive reasoning. Finally, the revised programme theories, which explain how the educational strategies are expected to work across different contexts in low socioeconomic communities, will be prepared and disseminated.
conclusionThe findings may inform practice, influence policy, and contribute to the design of health literacy programmes in similar settings. The realist review is registered with the Open Science Framework: (https://osf.io/9w867).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.