SynthesisPloS one2026
Primary cesarean section in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Robson Ten-Group Classification System.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe overuse of cesarean sections, mainly of primary procedures, is a major contributor to perinatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Robson Ten-Group Classification System is the global standard for cesarean section rate. Evidence on the pooled primary cesarean section rate using this system in Sub-Saharan Africa SSA remains limited. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Google, and ResearchGate were searched for studies published between 2001 and February 22, 2025. Data were extracted into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Stata 17. A random-effects model was applied to calculate the pooled rate. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Publication bias was assessed using a Doi plot and the Luis Furuya-Kanamori index. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.
resultsThe pooled facility‑based primary cesarean section rate, derived from 25 institution‑based studies (213,117 births; predominantly secondary and tertiary hospitals), in Sub-Saharan Africa was 18.7% (95% CI: 16.2-21.4; 95% prediction interval: 8.4%-36.8%). Robson Groups 1 and 2 were the largest contributors (47.5%), with Group 1 alone accounting for 37.1%. In both nulliparous and multiparous women, primary cesarean section was more common after spontaneous labor than after induction or elective procedures. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I² = 99.64%, p < 0.001). No evidence of publication bias was found (LFK index = -0.27).
conclusionThe facility‑based primary cesarean section rate in Sub-Saharan Africa exceeded the WHO global reference, with Robson Groups 1 and 2 being the largest contributors. High rates of prelabor cesarean and elevated rates following spontaneous labor raise concern for possible overuse, but unmeasured comorbidities and referral bias cannot be excluded. Stricter adherence to evidence-based protocols, routine use of the Robson classification for clinical audits, and linkage with indication‑level data are essential for improving obstetric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.