Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42531177›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Aligning deep learning and interpretable models for blood cell classification: A dual-model framework for explainability.

Magdalene Yeok Yu Cheong, Xinran Xu, Li Rong Wang, Timothy Xiao Jing Yeo, Hemalatha Shanmugam, Shu Ping Lim, Bingwen Eugene Fan, Xiuyi Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Magdalene Yeok Yu CheongCollege of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5622-833X
Xinran XuLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Li Rong WangCollege of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Timothy Xiao Jing YeoCollege of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Hemalatha ShanmugamDepartment of Haematology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Shu Ping LimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Bingwen Eugene FanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Xiuyi FanCollege of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1223-9986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood smear examination involves classifying cells by morphology under a microscope, a labour-intensive process prone to subjective variation. Recent deep learning models achieve strong performance in blood cell classification but remain as "black boxes", offering little clinical transparency. We propose a dual-model framework that pairs a deep YOLO (You Only Look Once) classifier with a shallow, interpretable explainer. YOLO performs classification and segmentation, while clinically informed features are extracted from segmented images to train the explainer on YOLO predictions. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) quantify feature importance, with discrepancies flagged as "other reasons" to enhance transparency. Evaluated on proprietary and public datasets (PBC, Raabin), YOLO achieved AUCs of 0.997, 0.994, and 1.000 respectively, with the explainer demonstrating strong alignment: Score-CAM activation maps agreed with SHAP-identified features. In a user study with 9 trained and qualified haematologists and laboratory medical technologists, predictions achieved 96.9% concurrence. This work shows that the coupling of deep learning with interpretable models improves the confidence of predictions while providing clinical meaningful insights.

Identifiers

PMID42531177
PMCPMC13422869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.