Trial reportWomen's health (London, England)
Sex-specific predictors of self-stigma reduction in psychosis resulting from metacognitive interventions: Results from a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06423651 (Benefits of Combining Metacognitive Training), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Benefits of Combining Metacognitive Training (MCT) With Cognitive Remediation (CR) in the Recovery of Patients With Psychotic Spectrum Disorders (CR+MCTp)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch on gender differences in self-stigma among individuals with psychosis is limited. Gender differences have been found in factors associated with self-stigma, such as self-esteem, quality of life, and cognitive insight.
objectivesThis study aimed to determine predictors of self-stigma reduction in men and women after receiving Metacognitive Training (MCT) or a combined intervention delivering MCT alongside cognitive rehabilitation.
designRandomized clinical trial with two intervention branches.
methodsParticipants were randomly allocated to one of two conditions: MCT or MCT alongside cognitive rehabilitation. Assessments were carried out before and after the intervention by blinded professionals. Linear mixed models, correlation analyses, and regressions were employed to examine the effect of treatment, relationships between variables, and potential predictors of treatment response in both groups for men and women, respectively.
resultsSelf-stigma was reduced in both intervention groups, with no significant differences between them, suggesting both interventions were effective. Descriptive analyses revealed women reported higher self-stigma (
conclusionDistinct pathways of self-stigma recovery emerged for women and men, underscoring the need for gender-sensitive interventions. These findings underscore the need for tailored stigma-reduction interventions that consider gender-specific factors influencing mental health outcomes. Longitudinal research should assess durability and further clarify gender-related mechanisms. REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06423651, Registration Number NCT06423651, 23/05/24.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.