Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42531012›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2026

Recent advances in screening, diagnosis, prognosis and personalized treatment of sepsis.

Natalie N Whitfield Jones, Casey Clements, Shailee Rasania, Thorsten Brenner, Oliver Liesenfeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalie N Whitfield Jones1Medical and Scientific Affairs, Deepull, Barcelona, Spain.
Casey Clements2Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shailee Rasania3Lumanity, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Thorsten Brenner4Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Oliver Liesenfeld5Institut für Mikrobiologie und Infektionsimmunologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4348-5509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a multi-system physiological syndrome defined as a dysregulated host response to infection. Despite recent advances clinicians continue to depend on clinically or physiologically defined syndromes as poor classifiers and therefore fail to accurately predict outcome or responses to treatment. Recent studies suggest that advances in screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of sepsis can be used to tailor immunomodulatory therapies. In the present narrative review, we critically analyze important academic literature published between January 2025 and June 2026 with a focus on epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, prognosis and personalized management. We believe that sepsis care will soon be defined by the convergence of rapid diagnostics, multi-omics profiling, and artificial intelligence, enabling a shift from generalized treatment approaches toward truly personalized, dynamic patient management. While the scientific and technological foundation for this transformation is emerging rapidly, clinical validation using innovative (adaptive) clinical trial design is required. Successful implementation within routine care will require multidisciplinary collaboration, robust infrastructure, clinician and patient engagement, and healthcare systems capable of integrating innovation into practice. The coming years may see a paradigm shift in sepsis management comparable to advances observed in personalized management of malignancies.

Indexed as

bacterial infectionepidemiologyhost responsepathogen identificationpersonalizedprognosisscreeningsepsistreatment

Identifiers

PMID42531012
PMCPMC13617347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.