ArticleJAMA network open2026
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Among Individuals Undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer substantial risks of breast and ovarian cancer; however, risk for female individuals undergoing testing, particularly those with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or negative results, remain poorly defined. Objective: To estimate lifetime incidence of breast and ovarian cancer among female individuals undergoing BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing across all result categories and evaluate the modifying association of family history. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted as part of the What Comes Next Cohort Study, a near-population-based cohort in Ontario, Canada, established through linkage with administrative databases. Female participants who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing from 2007 to 2016 were matched 1:5 to females from the general population. Participants were followed up to September 2024. Data were analyzed from May to December 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was the cumulative incidence of breast and ovarian cancer to age 80 years, stratified by genetic test result and family history. Results: Of 15 986 individuals in the What Comes Next Cohort Study cohort, 6966 individuals eligible for breast cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 49 [38-60] years) were matched to 34 830 individuals from the general population and 13 276 individuals eligible for ovarian cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 51 [41-61] years) were matched to 66 380 individuals from the general population. Cumulative breast cancer incidence to age 80 years was 62.1% (95% CI, 52.2%-69.9%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 66.1% (95% CI, 57.5%-72.9%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 12.0% (95% CI, 11.2%-12.8%) in the general population; corresponding ovarian cancer incidence was 56.0% (95% CI, 40.0%-67.7%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 29.3% (95% CI, 14.2%-41.7%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 1.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.7%) in the general population. Family history modified breast cancer risk, reaching a cumulative incidence of 86.3% (95% CI, 70.9%-93.5%) in carriers with at least 2 affected first-degree relatives vs 55.8% (95% CI, 45.4%-64.2%) in carriers without a family history of breast cancer. Among individuals with test results positive for pathogenic variants, lifetime risk of ovarian cancer was similarly modified by family history, reaching 64.2% (95% CI, 37.0%-79.7%) in those with vs 38.2% (95% CI, 25.8%-48.4%) in those without a family history of ovarian cancer. Individuals with VUS and negative test results also had increased lifetime breast cancer risks (31.2% [95% CI, 19.2%-41.4%] and 26.3% [95% CI, 23.0%-29.4%], respectively) but no increase in ovarian cancer risk. Individuals with test results negative for a known familial variant had risks similar to the general population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of females who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing, the lifetime cancer risk varied substantially across BRCA test result groups and was further modified by family history. Elevated breast cancer risk among individuals with VUS or negative results highlights the need for individualized risk assessment and management beyond genetic test results alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.