ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
robustocs: robust optimal contribution selection.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Conservation Genomic Strategy: Selection for the Probability of Offspring Heterozygosity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryOptimal contribution selection (OCS) is a selective breeding method that manages the conversion of genetic variation into genetic gain to facilitate short-term competitiveness and long-term sustainability of breeding programmes. Traditional approaches to OCS and truncation selection (TS) rely on estimates of breeding values and do not explicitly account for uncertainty in these estimates. Here, we use concepts from robust optimization to formulate a robust optimal contribution selection problem (ROCS) and develop two solutions based on conic optimization and sequential quadratic programming. We implemented these methods in the robustocs Python package, which leverages the Gurobi and HiGHS solvers. Our results show favorable performance when solving the ROCS problem using sequential quadratic programming with the HiGHS solver. We show that classical TS and OCS arise as special cases of the robust selection formulations (RTS and ROCS). We demonstrate the package with a small example, comparing outcomes of TS, RTS, OCS, and ROCS. Compared to TS and OCS, RTS and ROCS find contributions that reduce the uncertainty of genetic gain and group coancestry at the expense of reduced genetic gain. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: robustocs is implemented in Python and released, with documentation, on GitHub under the MIT license at https://github.com/Foggalong/RobustOCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.