ArticleObesity surgery2026
Clinical and Psychometric Predictors of a Positive Alcohol Use Disorder Screen after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlcohol use disorder (AUD) after bariatric surgery is increasingly recognized but remains under-detected because routine screening relies on self-report. We aimed to identify clinical and psychometric predictors of a positive alcohol screen and to build a simple risk-stratification model; as a secondary objective, we critically evaluated whether a routinely available hepatic enzyme, temporally anchored gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), adds information.
methodsThis was a single-center cross-sectional analysis of 130 adults who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and completed the Cut-down/Annoyed/Guilty/Eye-opener (CAGE) and AUDIT questionnaires during routine follow-up at a private clinic in Brazil. Questionnaire responses were linked to an institutional clinical-laboratory database. The primary outcome was a positive AUDIT screen (score ≥ 8). Multivariable logistic regression with 5,000 bootstrap resamples identified independent predictors. As a secondary, exploratory analysis, the GGT measurement closest to the questionnaire date was selected within ± 6-, ± 12-, and ± 24-month windows and compared between groups, with Benjamini-Hochberg correction across a four-marker hepatic-enzyme set; a linear mixed model examined longitudinal GGT trajectories.
resultsA positive AUDIT screen was identified in 32 patients (24.6%). Median age was 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 37-58; mean 47.4 ± 12.6), and 80% were women. Male sex (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.9-14.3) and paternal alcohol use (OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.2-13.7) were independent predictors; a two-variable model served as a candidate risk-stratification approach with selection-aware optimism-corrected internal performance (c-index 0.71; calibration slope 0.97), stratifying predicted risk from 9% (neither factor) to 75% (both, small stratum), and would require external validation before clinical use. In the AUDIT-anchored ± 6-month subgroup (n = 58), GGT was higher among screen-positive patients (median 31 vs. 15.5 U/L; AUC 0.72) but did not survive false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction (q = 0.055), and both medians remained within the reference range. A secondary, exploratory database analysis (Supplement) was directionally consistent at the group level but rested on an imperfect, construct-distinct label and is not confirmatory. The mixed model did not detect a divergent longitudinal GGT trajectory (β = 0.02 log-units/year, 95% CI - 0.02 to 0.06).
conclusionsAfter bariatric surgery, male sex and paternal alcohol use are strong, easily ascertained predictors of a positive alcohol screen in this cohort and can be translated into a simple, bedside risk-stratification approach (a candidate requiring external validation). GGT shows a weak, group-level association with alcohol use - specific within the hepatic-enzyme panel tested, yet within the reference range and uninformative at the individual level - so it may complement, but cannot replace, psychometric screening. These findings favor psychometric screening focused on identifiable risk strata, with routine GGT as at most a supportive signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.