Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530823›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Virtual reality in percutaneous coronary intervention: from coronary imaging and procedural planning to patient care.

Ioannis Skalidis, Giulia S Beretta, Lisa Simioni, Julius Jelisejevas, Giacomo Maria Cioffi, Peter Wenaweser, Pascal Meier, Philippe Garot, Thomas Hovasse, Mariama Akodad and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ioannis Skalidis *Department of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland. Skalidis7@gmail.com.
Giulia S Beretta *Department of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Lisa SimioniDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Julius JelisejevasDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Giacomo Maria CioffiDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Peter WenaweserDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Pascal MeierDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Philippe GarotInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital Jacques Cartier, Massy, France.
Thomas HovasseInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital Jacques Cartier, Massy, France.
Mariama AkodadInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital Jacques Cartier, Massy, France.
Anastasios ApostolosFaculty of Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Panayotis K VlachakisDepartment of Cardiology, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Serban PuricelDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Mario TogniDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Stephane CookDepartment of Cardiology, HFR - Fribourg Cantonal Hospital and University, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most frequently performed invasive procedures in medicine, yet it remains technically demanding, carries a long operator learning curve, exposes both patients and staff to ionising radiation, and is a recognised source of patient anxiety. Virtual reality (VR), which represent immersive, computer-generated environments experienced through a head-mounted display, has been proposed as a potential tool across the PCI pathway. This narrative review synthesises literature from the last five years on four domains in which VR has been applied to PCI: (1) operator training and skill acquisition; (2) patient-specific pre-procedural planning and rehearsal; (3) intraprocedural visualisation and guidance (where VR overlaps with augmented and mixed reality); and (4) patient-centred applications including periprocedural anxiety and pain management, education, and rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or revascularisation. The evidence is heterogeneous and dominated by small studies, feasibility reports, and a growing number of randomised trials in the patient-anxiety domain. Immersive VR reduces periprocedural anxiety and represents the most clinically mature application to date, although its analgesic effect is less consistent and it has not proven non-inferior to pharmacological sedation for pain; VR-based simulation can transfer skills to real catheterisation laboratory performance; and patient-specific VR can support planning in anatomically complex PCI. The principal barriers are the absence of robust haptic feedback, cost, limited validation, cybersickness, and a scarcity of outcome-driven randomised trials. VR is best understood not as a competitor to digital twins, physics-based simulation, or augmented/mixed reality, but as one complementary layer within a broader extended-reality ecosystem for coronary intervention. We outline priorities for future research, including standardised validation frameworks, integration with patient-specific digital twins, and adequately powered trials with clinical endpoints.

Indexed as

Interventional cardiologyPercutaneous coronary interventionProcedural anxietySimulationVirtual reality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.