ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of partial pulpotomy procedure in primary molars utilising different capping materials and different sealing methods: a randomised clinical trial.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06227390 (Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate and compare the 12-month clinical and radiographic success of partial pulpotomy in primary molars using three bioactive materials-MTA, Biodentine, and TheraCal PT-and to assess the influence of final restoration type on treatment outcomes.
methodsThis randomised controlled trial was conducted in a university postgraduate dental clinic setting and included 120 children aged 4-7 years with cariously exposed, restorable primary molars diagnosed with reversible pulpitis. Teeth were randomised to one of three pulp-capping materials (MTA, Biodentine, or TheraCal PT) and restored with either a preformed metal crown (PMC) or glass ionomer cement (GIC), forming six subgroups. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed at regular intervals using modified Zurn and Seale criteria. Outcome assessment was performed by two blinded evaluators. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used.
resultsA total of 120 participants (20 per subgroup) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed amongst the groups (p > 0.05). Overall success rates across the six subgroups ranged from 65 to 90% at 12 months. Cox regression showed no significant effect of capping material (Biodentine: HR = 1.06; TheraCal PT: HR = 1.75; overall p > 0.05) or restoration type (GI vs PMC: HR = 1.79; 95% CI 0.82-3.92; p = 0.145) on treatment survival. No material-related adverse events were reported.
conclusionsPartial pulpotomy using MTA, Biodentine, or TheraCal PT demonstrated comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes at 12 months. No statistically significant differences were observed between the evaluated materials or final restoration types. CLINICAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06227390, submission date: 22 December 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.