Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530796›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of partial pulpotomy procedure in primary molars utilising different capping materials and different sealing methods: a randomised clinical trial.

A M Elsharkawy, N S Kabil, N Metwalli, O Abd El Geleel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06227390 (Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06227390 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBritish University In EgyptRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsPulp Disease, DentalArmspartial pulpotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A M ElsharkawyDepartment of pediatric dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt. ali.elsharkawy@bue.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0882-6703
N S KabilDepartment of pediatric dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0271-5729
N MetwalliDepartment of pediatric dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3055-5643
O Abd El GeleelDepartment of pediatric dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0580-094X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate and compare the 12-month clinical and radiographic success of partial pulpotomy in primary molars using three bioactive materials-MTA, Biodentine, and TheraCal PT-and to assess the influence of final restoration type on treatment outcomes.

methodsThis randomised controlled trial was conducted in a university postgraduate dental clinic setting and included 120 children aged 4-7 years with cariously exposed, restorable primary molars diagnosed with reversible pulpitis. Teeth were randomised to one of three pulp-capping materials (MTA, Biodentine, or TheraCal PT) and restored with either a preformed metal crown (PMC) or glass ionomer cement (GIC), forming six subgroups. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed at regular intervals using modified Zurn and Seale criteria. Outcome assessment was performed by two blinded evaluators. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used.

resultsA total of 120 participants (20 per subgroup) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed amongst the groups (p > 0.05). Overall success rates across the six subgroups ranged from 65 to 90% at 12 months. Cox regression showed no significant effect of capping material (Biodentine: HR = 1.06; TheraCal PT: HR = 1.75; overall p > 0.05) or restoration type (GI vs PMC: HR = 1.79; 95% CI 0.82-3.92; p = 0.145) on treatment survival. No material-related adverse events were reported.

conclusionsPartial pulpotomy using MTA, Biodentine, or TheraCal PT demonstrated comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes at 12 months. No statistically significant differences were observed between the evaluated materials or final restoration types. CLINICAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06227390, submission date: 22 December 2023.

Indexed as

BiodentineMTAPartial pulpotomyPrimary molarsTheraCal PTVital pulp therapy

Identifiers

PMID42530796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.