SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Equity, evidence and indigenous knowledges in PROMs in Australian injury research: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used in trauma and injury research to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health and functional recovery. However, PROMs are rarely adapted to reflect the lived experiences, cultural values and determinants of health for priority populations, particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, who experience a disproportionate burden of injury in Australia. This systematic review addressed the inclusion of health equity indicators and Indigenous knowledges for PROMs used in observational Australian trauma and injury studies for adults (≥ 18 years).
methodsA systematic search of Medline (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Scopus was performed including prospective cohort or longitudinal designs, focused on trauma-related injuries conducted in Australia. Data were extracted and appraised using the CREATE and PROGRESS-PLUS tools to assess Indigenous engagement and equity-sensitive reporting.
resultsAcross the 11 included studies, 17 different PROMs were used with SF-36 and PCL-C being the most common. Physical and mental health outcomes were consistently impaired post-injury, with long-term impacts. Equity considerations were largely absent; none of the studies met all PROGRESS-PLUS criteria and Indigenous knowledges were not incorporated. Priority populations, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities, people with disabilities and women, were frequently underrepresented or excluded.
conclusionThese findings highlight significant gaps in equity-sensitive PROM use and the urgent need for culturally safe and inclusive PROM development that reflects diverse recovery experiences thereby supporting equitable trauma care and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.