ArticleOral radiology2026
Application of a novel age estimation model based on permanent maxillary canine morphometric features in a Japanese population.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to clarify the growth curves of the long axis and apical foramen diameter of permanent maxillary canines (PMCs), and to create and evaluate a new nonlinear age estimation (NAGE) model by integrating their inverse functions within a machine learning framework.
methodsCT measurements of length (L), apical shortest width (SW) and longest width (LW) were obtained from 726 PMCs (aged 1 to 23 years). Growth curves were modeled using Gompertz function for L and Gamma-type function for SW and LW. Inverse functions were integrated into the NAGE model: [Formula: see text]. Parameters were optimized using Soft-L1 robust least squares (SciPy, NumFOCUS, USA). Validation applied to 14 independent longitudinal cases (75 PMCs, 3-15 years). Agreement between predicted age (PA) and chronological age (CA) was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R
resultsThe Gompertz and Gamma-type functions effectively captured PMC growth, with RMSE of 2.5 mm (L), 1.07 mm (SW), and 1.45 mm (LW). The NAGE achieved RMSE of 1.89 years (R
conclusionsThe proposed NAGE model showed promising performance for dental age estimation based on PMC length and apical foramen widths. Further studies in other teeth are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.