ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Differences in perceptions of quality of dying scores during the last days of life on Belgian acute geriatric wards: a prospective observational study in relatives, nurses, and doctors.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis multicentre prospective observational study aimed to describe the evolution of pain and comfort during the last days of life in older people, comparing assessments by relatives, nurses, and doctors.
methodsRelatives, nurses and doctors of patients with an expected death, admitted to acute geriatric wards in two Belgian university hospitals, completed the End-of-Life in Dementia-Comfort Assessment in Dying scale (EOLD-CAD, range 14-42, higher scores indicating higher comfort) once per day. Pain scores were retrieved from medical charts. Linear mixed models assessed longitudinal evolutions and inter-rater correlations.
resultsAfter the last days of life were recognised, median time until death of 103 included patients was 39.6 h. Nurses and doctors completed scales for 84 patients and relatives for 42. Doctors scored higher on the EOLD-CAD scale compared to relatives (+ 3.4, p = 0.005), with largest difference on the dying symptoms subscale. EOLD-CAD-scores increased over time for relatives (+ 1.2 per 24 h, p = 0.001). Compared to relatives, doctors' and nurses' scores increased 0.7 less (p = 0.09) and 1.1 less (p = 0.004) per 24 h, respectively. Patient level correlations were weak, with highest correlation between nurses and doctors (maximum r = 0.25, p = 0.005). All correlations with relatives were low and non-significant.
conclusionQuality of dying scores improved over time. Perceptions evaluated with EOLD-CAD scale differ between relatives, nurses and doctors, particularly regarding dying symptoms. These results underscore the importance of timely and active communication to explore relatives' perspectives during the last days of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.