ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Treatment outcomes of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery with multivisceral resection of adjacent organs.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery is increasingly adopted for rectal cancer management, including selected patients with locally advanced disease. We evaluated perioperative safety and medium- to long-term outcomes after robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery with multivisceral resection for cT4 rectal cancer in a single high-volume center. We retrospectively reviewed 45 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted surgery with multivisceral resection between April 2021 and June 2025. Demographic and clinical variables, surgical and postoperative outcomes, and pathological findings were extracted from medical records. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival, and local recurrence were assessed. The study included 45 patients (19 females) with a median age of 72 years. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher occurred in 4 patients (8.8%). Pathologically, 21 patients (46.7%) had pT4 disease (pT4a in 2 and pT4b in 19 [42.2%]), and 39 patients (86.7%) achieved RM0 margins. The median follow-up was 23 months. Across stages I-III, RM0 resection was associated with superior 3-year RFS compared with RM1/RMX resection (74.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.03). Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery combined with multivisceral resection can be performed safely, with acceptable midterm outcomes. RM0 status was linked to improved RFS, supporting complete tumor resection as a prognostic determinant even in locally advanced cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.