ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026
Tumorigenesis of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: 12q amplicon architecture, oncogenic cargo, and evolutionary progression.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are characterized by recurrent MDM2-centered amplification of chromosome 12q13-15, yet this diagnostic label reduces a complex structural lesion to a binary result. An architecture-resolved 12q amplicon platform requires an MDM2-centered dosage anchor plus direct evidence of nontrivial topology or carrier state; cargo, regulatory, and functional data define progressively higher-resolution features. When only MDM2 amplification is documented, the lesion is best described as diagnostic 12q amplification rather than a fully resolved platform. This review presents an evidence-graded architecture-to-function framework that separates direct WDLPS/DDLPS observations from mechanisms inferred from broader amplification biology. Disease-specific evidence supports heterogeneous 12q carriers, including ring, giant marker, rod-shaped, discontinuous, and neochromosome-like structures, as well as enhancer coamplification or altered 3D contacts. In contrast, chromothripsis, telomere crisis/BFB remodeling, ecDNA-like dynamics, and enhancer hubs are treated as extrapolated or testable mechanisms unless directly validated in liposarcoma. Conclusions are weighted by methodological resolution: cytogenetics/FISH define diagnostic amplification and visible carrier classes; MLPA or array-based assays define dosage and discontinuity; WGS with long-read or optical mapping is needed for junction-level architecture; and single-cell/spatial assays mainly resolve cellular-state or ecosystem context unless paired with structural readouts. MDM2-p53 and CDK4-RB remain central outputs, whereas selected cargo, lineage state, metabolism, and tumor-microenvironment programs are interpreted as evidence-ranked cooperating or downstream modules. Clinically, architecture-aware interpretation is proposed as a prospective framework for sampling, model design, biomarker development, and trial stratification, not as an established basis for routine management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530701What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.