Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530698›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Emerging biomarkers in breast fibroadenoma: implications for differential diagnosis, malignant transformation, and precision medicine.

Nishaa Ravi, Roopika Sankar, Anugraha Mathavan, Suresh Kumar Rayala, Ganesh Venkatraman, Bhawna Dev

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nishaa RaviDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Porur, Chennai, India.
Roopika SankarDepartment of Bio Medical Sciences, School of Bio Sciences & Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Anugraha MathavanDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai, India.
Suresh Kumar RayalaDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai, India.
Ganesh VenkatramanDepartment of Bio Medical Sciences, School of Bio Sciences & Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Bhawna DevDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Porur, Chennai, India. bhawnadev@sriramachandra.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroadenoma is the most common benign fibroepithelial lesion of the breast; it occurs most frequently in adolescents and women of reproductive age. While fibroadenoma is considered a non-invasive lesion with a good prognosis, some fibroadenomas may show rapid growth, recurrence, stromal hypercellularity, epithelial proliferative changes and even show radiological overlap with phyllodes tumour and breast carcinoma resulting in significant diagnostic dilemmas. In recent years, molecular pathology and biomarker studies have led to better understanding of the biology of fibroadenomas, and their ability to differentiate between fibroadenomas and malignant breast lesions. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of biomarkers involved in the diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, molecular, genetic, epigenetic, functional, circulating and imaging of breast fibroadenoma and breast cancer. The key biomarkers such as MED12 mutation, Ki-67, p53, Bcl-2, ER/PR, HER2, VEGF, MMPs, γ-H2AX, ctDNA, circulating tumour cells and transcriptomic classifiers are discussed in the context of tumour proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion, genomic instability and malignant transformation risk. The retrieved relevant literature was from 2000 to 2025 from the databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The review further emphasizes the growing significance of liquid biopsy, radiomics, artificial intelligence, digital pathology, and the integration of multi-omics techniques for enhancing lesion classification, diagnostic accuracy, and personalized risk assessment. Many challenges still exist such as a lack of standardised cut off values for biomarkers, overlap between fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour, a lack of molecular panels specifically designed for fibroadenoma and a lack of long-term validation studies. Further incorporation of molecular profiling, imaging biomarkers, computational pathology, and precision oncology approaches into the future could greatly enhance the risk stratification and handling of benign and malignant fibroepithelial breast lesions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFibroadenomaCell Transformation, NeoplasticDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansPrecision MedicinePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkers, TumorBreast neoplasmsFibroadenomaLiquid biopsyMED12Precision Medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.