ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative hydrocephalus is a common complication following posterior fossa tumor resection, affecting 7-40% of patients. Although preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion may be required in selected patients with hydrocephalus, decisions remain individualized in routine neurosurgical practice. We therefore developed and externally validated a model to provide supplementary preoperative risk stratification using routinely available variables. We retrospectively analyzed 1,073 patients following resection of posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) treated at five tertiary centers between 2013 and 2024, dividing them into a development cohort (n = 854) and an external validation cohort (n = 219). We initially screened 30 perioperative variables from the multicenter dataset and then selected a clinically implementable model restricted to variables available before tumor resection. Feature importance was ranked using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and seven distinct machine learning (ML) algorithms were evaluated. Model performance was comprehensively measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision-recall curves, and decision curve analysis. The final clinically implementable model included three preoperative variables: Evans index, tumor-fourth ventricle relationship, and preoperative cerebrospinal fluid diversion status. In the external validation cohort, the support vector machine model showed good external discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.877, accuracy of 81.3%, sensitivity of 80.8%, and specificity of 81.7%. Logistic regression achieved comparable discrimination. Calibration assessment suggested dataset shift between the development and external validation cohorts, indicating that absolute predicted probabilities should be interpreted cautiously in populations with different baseline risks. A concise three-variable preoperative model showed good external discrimination for clinically relevant postoperative hydrocephalus after posterior fossa tumor resection. The model may support preoperative risk communication and postoperative surveillance planning, but should not be used as a stand-alone indication for cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Prospective validation and local recalibration are warranted before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.