Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530672›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2026

Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients.

Ronghao Li, Dan Li, Li Liu, Wenyu Ji, Yuchun Pei, Run Wan, Dong Liu, Yongxin Wang, Suo Liu, Tingqin Huang and 10 more

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ronghao LiCenter of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Dan LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Digital Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Wenyu JiPediatric Neurosurgical Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Yuchun PeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
Run WanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang No. 1, Xiangyang, China.
Dong LiuPediatric Neurosurgical Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Yongxin WangPediatric Neurosurgical Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Suo LiuPediatric Neurosurgical Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Tingqin HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Ming ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Xiaobin LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, China.
Chenghai ZuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Chong LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Xu FangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Changlin YinCollege of Electronic and Information Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Rong HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhao YangDepartment of Neurology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 402160, China. yangzhao5140@sohu.com.
Liang TanCenter of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. liangtan@tmmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-2134
Jingyu ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. Cjy1_2001@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative hydrocephalus is a common complication following posterior fossa tumor resection, affecting 7-40% of patients. Although preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion may be required in selected patients with hydrocephalus, decisions remain individualized in routine neurosurgical practice. We therefore developed and externally validated a model to provide supplementary preoperative risk stratification using routinely available variables. We retrospectively analyzed 1,073 patients following resection of posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) treated at five tertiary centers between 2013 and 2024, dividing them into a development cohort (n = 854) and an external validation cohort (n = 219). We initially screened 30 perioperative variables from the multicenter dataset and then selected a clinically implementable model restricted to variables available before tumor resection. Feature importance was ranked using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and seven distinct machine learning (ML) algorithms were evaluated. Model performance was comprehensively measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision-recall curves, and decision curve analysis. The final clinically implementable model included three preoperative variables: Evans index, tumor-fourth ventricle relationship, and preoperative cerebrospinal fluid diversion status. In the external validation cohort, the support vector machine model showed good external discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.877, accuracy of 81.3%, sensitivity of 80.8%, and specificity of 81.7%. Logistic regression achieved comparable discrimination. Calibration assessment suggested dataset shift between the development and external validation cohorts, indicating that absolute predicted probabilities should be interpreted cautiously in populations with different baseline risks. A concise three-variable preoperative model showed good external discrimination for clinically relevant postoperative hydrocephalus after posterior fossa tumor resection. The model may support preoperative risk communication and postoperative surveillance planning, but should not be used as a stand-alone indication for cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Prospective validation and local recalibration are warranted before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusInfratentorial NeoplasmsMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineExternal ventricular drainageHydrocephalusMachine learningPosterior fossa tumorSupport vector machine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.