Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530630›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Progressive deterioration in dietary intake and nutritional risk during oncological treatment in children with solid tumors: a prospective longitudinal study.

Ecem Misirlioğlu, Beril Köse, Zuhal Önder Siviş, Eda Ataseven, Derya Hopanci Biçakli, Mehmet Kantar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ecem MisirlioğluDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Avrasya University, Trabzon, Turkey. ecemmisirlioglu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0944-4831
Beril KöseDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5173-2389
Zuhal Önder SivişDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Izmir City Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-1864
Eda AtasevenDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-5814
Derya Hopanci BiçakliDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Muğla Sitki Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1594-3266
Mehmet KantarDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-4321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChildren with solid tumors are highly vulnerable to treatment-related nutritional compromise. However, longitudinal data describing how dietary intake and nutritional risk evolve during therapy remain limited. This study aimed to examine longitudinal changes in dietary intake adequacy and nutritional risk across different phases of oncological treatment and to identify clinically vulnerable periods requiring intensified supportive care.

methodsIn this prospective longitudinal study, children aged 8-18 years with newly diagnosed solid tumors were assessed at three predefined treatment phases (early-, mid-, and late-treatment). Dietary intake was evaluated using interviewer-verified 3-day food records at each time point. Energy and nutrient intakes were expressed as percentages of age- and sex-specific estimated requirements. Nutritional risk was assessed using the Screening Tool for Childhood Cancer Nutrition Risk (SCAN). Longitudinal changes were analyzed using non-parametric repeated-measures methods, and associations with gastrointestinal symptoms and taste alterations were explored.

resultsSixty children completed all assessments. Energy adequacy was below recommended levels at all assessment points and declined significantly over time (p = 0.001), with most patients failing to meet recommended energy requirements throughout treatment. Significant reductions were observed in carbohydrate, fat, dietary fiber, and selected micronutrients, particularly iron and magnesium. Absolute protein intake remained statistically unchanged over time, whereas the relative contribution of protein to total energy intake increased significantly. More than 80% of patients were classified as being at nutritional risk at all time points. Higher nutritional risk scores were significantly associated with greater gastrointestinal symptom burden and taste alterations (all p < 0.05). Nutritional vulnerability was present across all assessment points. The mid-treatment phase was characterized by relatively greater deterioration in dietary adequacy and nutritional risk indicators; however, inadequate intake and elevated nutritional risk persisted throughout treatment.

conclusionsChildren with solid tumors experience progressive deterioration in dietary intake adequacy during oncological treatment, with nutritional vulnerability evident across the treatment trajectory and relatively greater deterioration observed during mid-treatment. Future supportive care strategies should move beyond monitoring intake alone and focus on identifying modifiable factors driving dietary decline, including gastrointestinal symptoms and taste alterations, to determine the extent to which this deterioration can be prevented or reversed and when nutritional interventions may be most effective.

Indexed as

DietNeoplasmsNutritional StatusAdolescentChildDiet RecordsEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNutritional RequirementsNutrition AssessmentProspective StudiesDietary intakeLongitudinal studyNutritional riskPediatric oncologySolid tumorsSupportive care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.