ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Cement discoplasty for degenerative low back pain: a delphi consensus survey of expert opinion.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCement discoplasty (CD) is a spine surgery technique involving percutaneous or open polymethylmethacrylate injection into an empty degenerative vacuum disc in the lumbar spine. Although cement acts optimally under compression, the concept of stabilizing without fusing remains uncertain regarding its clinical effectiveness. Despite multiple outcome studies and several meta-analyses, CD continues to be controversial, poorly understood, and not integrated into mainstream surgical practice. Establishing a unified platform is necessary to clarify indications and technique.
methodsInternational peer-reviewed experts in CD were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi process using independent self-administered questionnaires. Fifty statements were developed across five categories: Rationale, Imaging Studies, Technical Aspects, Clinical Indications, and Postoperative Management. Responses were graded on a five-point Likert scale. The survey underwent pilot testing by two experts to ensure face validity and clarity. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement.
resultsTen experts completed all three rounds. Agreed rationale included restoring anterior column loading, stabilization through annular ligamentotaxis, and increasing foraminal height. Indications included facet arthrosis and mild coronal deformity (Cobb 10-30°). Radiographs and CT were considered appropriate to confirm vacuum disc and subchondral endplate sclerosis. Accepted trajectories were trans- or extra-pedicular, with combined approaches permitted when decompression for stenosis was required. Early mobilization was unanimously recommended.
conclusionConsensus was reached on essential aspects of this little-known procedure, including rationale, imaging, technical considerations, clinical indications, and postoperative management. This foundation may improve understanding and guide future adoption of cement discoplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.