ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2026
Sex differences in urinary extracellular vesicles originating from the genitourinary system in health and disease.
Review in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) have risen to the forefront as a source of biomarkers in urine, a biofluid that can be obtained noninvasively in large quantities. These lipid bilayer-bound, anucleate particles contain molecular cargo that may reflect the pathology of disease processes affecting the urogenital and reproductive systems. Urinary EVs can be derived from a variety of organs including the kidney, bladder, and urethra, as well as the testis, epididymis, vas deferens, prostate, and seminal vesicles in males, or the uterus, vagina, and placenta (during pregnancy) in females, as well as from microbiota present in the bladder or urogenital tract, leading to differences in biomolecular cargo based on sex. Hormonal cycles, circadian rhythms, age, and stress might further influence sex differences in uEVs. Despite growing interest in uEVs as biomarkers for renal and urological diseases, the majority of clinical studies to date have relied on urine samples from male-dominant cohorts, including investigations of sex chromosome-linked disorders. This sampling bias has contributed to a significant knowledge gap regarding sex-specific differences in uEV composition and function, which may critically influence disease mechanisms, diagnostic accuracy, and therapeutic targeting. Addressing this gap is essential for advancing the translational relevance and inclusivity of uEV-based research. This state-of-the-art review focuses on the current literature comparing male versus female uEVs using a variety of orthogonal methods across different studies. We also provide insights to address variability and improve rigor and reproducibility in uEV studies targeting both men's and women's health disorders, to move this field forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.