ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
A Bayesian Optimal Adaptive Clinical Trial Design for Sequentially Integrated Therapies.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical syndromes or diseases with complex etiology often require multiple treatments, each addressing one specific aspect of the disease. Such treatments are typically administered sequentially in an integrated fashion. For example, in alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), an acute liver disease caused by excessive alcohol drinking, successful treatment requires therapies that reduce liver inflammation during the acute phase, followed by interventions that address the underlying alcohol use disorder (AUD) to achieve optimal outcomes. Selecting an optimal treatment combination, however, presents great challenges in study design due to the involvement of multiple drug combinations and treatment phases. In this paper, we describe a new trial design based on a Bayesian model that connects the outcomes from the acute and subsequent treatment phases. We refer to this design as the Bayesian Optimal Adaptive Design for Sequentially Integrated Therapies (BIT) design. BIT incorporates multiple interim analyses with adaptive stopping rules for both futility and superiority, enhancing efficiency while controlling the family-wise type I error rate and maximizing statistical power. We illustrate the use of BIT design in a clinical trial comparing the efficacy of integrated therapy for severe AH, with sample size determination and design parameter optimization. Simulation studies show that the design possesses excellent operating characteristics, including experiment-wise type I error rate control. Although the design's development is motivated by studies of AH treatment, the design framework is broadly applicable to other complex diseases requiring sequentially delivered therapies. R codes are provided for BIT implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.