SynthesisThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Pharmacological Influences on the R2 Blink Reflex Response in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacological Influences on the R2 Blink Reflex Response in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The R2 blink reflex (BR) is a polysynaptic brainstem-mediated response that can be activated by innocuous and noxious electrocutaneous stimulation of the supraorbital nerve and has been used as a biomarker across pharmacological studies. Whilst standard patch electrodes activate both the tactile (R1) and nociceptive (R2) components of the blink reflex, concentric electrodes preferentially evoke a nociceptive-specific response (NBR) by isolating the R2 component. This preregistered systematic review (CRD420251014203) aims to assess the pharmacological modulation of nociceptive R2 responses as measured by both standard patch and concentric electrodes in healthy participants. Following PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches of PubMed, Cochrane and Ovid identified studies examining R2 responses in healthy adults receiving a pharmacological intervention. Data were extracted on study design, drug category, stimulation electrode, dosage and outcome measures. Nine studies met inclusion criteria, which included eight distinct drug classes. Limited effects on the R2 response were found for opioids, selective serotonin receptor agonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and ketamine. In contrast, α2-adrenoreceptor modulators, benzodiazepines, nitrous oxide and selective adenosine A1 receptor agonists demonstrated effects. The stimulation electrode used did not affect the impact of intervention on nociceptive R2 responses where comparable studies were available. These findings indicate that nociceptive R2 components of the BR, whether evoked using standard or concentric electrodes, exhibit comparable sensitivity to pharmacological modulation. Future research should further delineate the contributions of local and descending modulatory systems to nociceptive-specific and tactile processing within trigeminofacial circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.