Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530353›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2026

Biofluorescence in polar zoarcid eelpouts: The Arctic eelpout Lycodes reticulatus (Reinhardt, 1835) and the Antarctic eelpout Pachycara brachycephalum (Pappenheim, 1912).

Thomas Juhasz-Dora, Matthew Slater, Amirhossein Karamyar, Stein-Kato Lindberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas Juhasz-DoraInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-7395
Matthew SlaterAlfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-544X
Amirhossein KaramyarAlfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Stein-Kato LindbergCentre of Clinical Documentation and Evaluation, Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-255X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofluorescence is widespread among marine fish but remains poorly documented in polar ecosystems. Using hyperspectral imaging, we report fluorescent emissions in two polar zoarcid eelpouts. A captive Antarctic eelpout (Pachycara brachycephalum) displayed uniform bright green fluorescence (~500-520 nm), whereas an Arctic eelpout (Lycodes reticulatus) showed weaker patterned emissions (~510-590 nm). Under identical illumination, the Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) exhibited no detectable fluorescence. Although observations were limited to single individuals per species, spectral peaks substantially exceeded calibration reference values, indicating genuine fluorescent emissions. These observations represent the first reported occurrence of biofluorescence in an Antarctic teleost and expand the phylogenetic distribution of fluorescent fish to include Zoarcidae. The results also demonstrate the potential of portable hyperspectral imaging for non-invasive detection of fluorescent traits in cold-adapted fish.

Indexed as

PerciformesAnimalsAntarctic RegionsArctic RegionsFluorescenceAntarcticArcticbiofluorescencehyperspectral imagingpolar fishZoarcidae

Identifiers

PMID42530353
PMCPMC13675505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.