Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530320›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

Partnering with AI to create joy-centered personalized learning in a post-pandemic world.

Jackie E Shay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Practical and positive uses of AI in STEM education: taming the AI tiger.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jackie E ShayDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-2383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STEM instructors are teaching in classrooms shaped by wide variation in students' prior preparation, learning experiences, and well-being, much of which has been intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are becoming increasingly available in higher education, prompting questions about how to use them productively and responsibly to support student learning. Personalized learning has been proposed as one approach for addressing these challenges, yet it remains difficult to implement at scale without increasing instructor workload or burnout. This Tips & Tools article presents a practical approach for partnering with AI to support joy-centered, personalized learning in STEM classrooms. Drawing on principles from joy-centered pedagogy, the procedure demonstrates how instructors can intentionally frame large language models (LLMs) to support student learning by fostering mattering, resilience, and agency through structured prompts. The approach formalizes instructional strategies implemented across lower- and upper-division undergraduate biology courses to support self-directed learning and growth-oriented revision, illustrating how AI can extend personalized learning opportunities at scale. The article introduces three prompt-based joy-centered pedagogy themes: normalizing uncertainty, promoting growth over perfection, and flattening classroom hierarchy. Each theme is accompanied by student-ready prompts and AI literacy guidance that instructors can readily integrate into courses. By positioning LLMs as pedagogical partners, this approach offers an accessible strategy for supporting diverse learners while preserving instructor bandwidth in an increasingly complex learning world.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencejoy-centered pedagogypersonalized learningpost-pandemic learningSTEM education

Identifiers

PMID42530320
PMCPMC13520708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.