ReviewmBio2026
Approaching the post-antibiotic era: phage therapy current practices and future horizons.
Review in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophages (phages) are the viral predators of bacteria. Their ability to infect and kill bacterial strains has been harnessed for use in clinical practice for more than a century, but their development stalled for decades in many regions. Now, in the face of increasingly complex bacterial infections that fail conventional therapeutic options, and the growing global threat of antibiotic resistance, interest in phage therapy has resurged. Data evaluating the impact of phage therapy via clinical trials are steadily increasing, but remain sparse. Yet, an ever-growing number of case reports and case series highlights the potential of phage therapy to make a positive impact in the battle against antimicrobial resistance and difficult-to-treat bacterial infections. In this review, we summarize the available data describing the clinical utility of phage therapy, highlight infectious indications where phage therapy shows strong potential, and call attention to disease states where the benefits of phage therapy, as it is practiced today, are less certain. Furthermore, we note areas where there is a crucial need for additional research and propose how scientists and clinicians can work together to design and carry out the preclinical and clinical studies that will take phage therapy into its next century.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.