ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
Influences on students' decisions to study occupational therapy at a regional Australian university: A mixed methods study.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influences on students' decisions to study occupational therapy at a regional Australian university: A mixed methods study.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is limited information about why students decide to study occupational therapy as a course in Australian higher education. Understanding what influences students' decisions is important to ensure adequate workforce growth to support Australia's growing population. Therefore, the study's aim was to identify what influences students' decisions to study occupational therapy at a regional Australian university, as well as potential facilitators and barriers affecting these decisions.
methodsAn explanatory mixed methods design was used. One hundred and thirty-four student participants completed an online survey through purposeful sampling, and a convenience sample of 13 survey participants completed follow-up semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey data, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Consumers and community members were not involved in the development or undertaking of this research.
resultsOccupational therapy aligned with students' values, skills, and roles, which influenced their decision to study the profession. These influences included making a positive impact on people's lives (83.2%) and a desire to work in health care (77.1%). Financial supports facilitated their decision to study occupational therapy through family, flexible employment, and government supports. Students primarily heard about the profession through family (30.6%) or friends (18.7%), with their decision heavily influenced by personal connections affording positive exposure to the profession. Narrow societal knowledge and perception of occupational therapy resulted in students gaining a limited understanding of the broad scope and role of the profession.
conclusionThe key findings showed the influence of personal networks in course decision-making, in addition to a narrow societal knowledge and perception of occupational therapy. This finding suggests the need for greater opportunity for diverse exposure to the occupational therapy profession, with more information provided to prospective students about the scope of occupational therapy practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.