Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530034›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2026

Pectinase-Based Bioprocesses for Circular Bioeconomy and Sustainable Industrial Development.

Nisha Sharma, Dimple Tanwar, Usha Grewal, Murugesan Mohana Keerthi, Yogesh K Ahlawat, Nitin Pandey, Chirag G Makvana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nisha SharmaDepartment of Microbiology, School of Allied Sciences, Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3500-598X
Dimple TanwarSchool of Bioengineering and Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Usha GrewalDepartment of Chemistry, Physics and Atmospheric Science, Jackson State University, Jackson, Massachusetts, USA.
Murugesan Mohana KeerthiSchool of Agriculture, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-0200
Yogesh K AhlawatCentre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-6972
Nitin PandeyDepartment of Biosciences, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Chirag G MakvanaFaculty of Science, Gokul Global University, Sidhpur, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pectinases play a vital role in the degradation of pectic part of the plant cell wall and are considered in the group of hydrolytic enzymes. In the present scenario, demand of economically feasible and environment friendly techniques and approaches has significantly led the research on the microbial production, standardization of process parameters and improvements of pectinases. The development of pectinase-based bioprocesses has been found to promote sustainable industrial practices by reducing the use of chemicals, energy, and waste, thereby supporting eco-friendly production systems. The unique aspect of this review is that it explains traditional methods of pectinase production alongside novel methods, which include solid-state and submerged fermentation, recombinant DNA techniques, heterologous gene expression, protein engineering, CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies, enzyme immobilization, and nanobiotechnological methods, which improve the production, stability, and performance of pectinases. It further demonstrates the increasing importance of the use of pectinases in sustainable manufacturing through decreasing the use of chemicals and energy, as well as reducing waste production from industry. It illustrates that innovations in microbial strain engineering, process optimization, and utilization of low-cost substrates have significantly increased the economic viability and efficiency of producing pectinases. Yet, some issues associated with commercialization, standardization of production processes, recovery, and stability of enzymes still exist. Overall, this review paper gives an overview of the recent advancements and limitations of next-generation pectinases.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyPolygalacturonaseSustainable DevelopmentProtein EngineeringPolygalacturonaseecofriendlyenzymeindustrial applicationspectinasesustainability

Identifiers

PMID42530034
PMCPMC13665584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.