ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2026
Multiomics Profiling Identifies Blood-Based Diagnostic Markers for Sepsis.
Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiomics Profiling Identifies Blood-Based Diagnostic Markers for Sepsis.Journal of cellular physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis, characterized by a rapid transition to systemic immune dysregulation and multiorgan failure, poses a formidable clinical challenge. The lack of spatiotemporally stable biomarkers severely impedes early diagnosis and risk stratification. By integrating large-scale transcriptomic profiling with machine learning algorithms, this study identified a robust three-gene diagnostic signature (TLR5, HMGB2, and C19orf59). Single-cell RNA sequencing precisely localized the sepsis-induced specific upregulation of these targets to the myeloid immune compartment, notably monocytes and neutrophils. Crucially, disease severity stratification analysis (based on SOFA scores) revealed that while TLR5 and HMGB2 excel in identifying high-risk sepsis, C19orf59 maintains highly consistent diagnostic efficacy across all clinical severity strata. To definitively validate these findings while rigorously eliminating confounding effects from surgical or environmental stress, strictly time-matched sham-controlled cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) murine models and vehicle-controlled in vitro models were utilized. In vivo results corroborated the persistent in situ upregulation of this signature across vital target organs (lung, heart, liver) and systemic circulation. Parallel in vitro lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated cellular models further characterized their dynamic expression, with HMGB2 exhibiting a distinct biphasic kinetic profile mechanistically characteristic of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Finally, independent clinical validation using sepsis patient serum corroborated the translational relevance of these targets. Collectively, this systematic multidimensional evaluation establishes TLR5, HMGB2, and C19orf59 as a highly reliable diagnostic and severity-stratification panel, providing novel molecular insights into the septic pathological cascade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.