ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2026
Content validation of the nursing diagnosis Adult Disuse Syndrome: A quantitative study.
Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to establish the content validity of the proposed nursing diagnosis (ND) Adult Disuse Syndrome and all its components.MethodThis is an exploratory descriptive study of diagnostic content validation under Fehring's proposal. Forty three expert nurses with clinical, teaching, and research experience analyzed the components of the diagnosis. The representativeness and relevance of the components of the diagnosis under study were evaluated through a Likert-type questionnaire. Data distribution analysis was carried out, and the components were validated if their content validity index (CVI) was over 0.80. The overall CVI was obtained for the clinical indicators.FindingsA total of 12 defining characteristics (DCs) were validated, 3 etiological factors were highly related, 6 risk populations were confirmed, and 11 conditions were considered associated. Most validated DCs refer to the physical dimension, but those focusing on the psychological and social dimensions were also validated. The etiological factors were related to the effects of immobility. The risk populations were validated in different contexts or situations, and associated conditions were mainly oriented toward chronic conditions.ConclusionsThis study validated the content of the elements of the proposed ND "Adult Disuse Syndrome." These were considered relevant and appropriate by both academic and clinical experts.Implications for nursing practiceThe content validation by experts of the components of the ND "Adult Disuse Syndrome" provides nurses with a tool for the identification of the phenomenon that exceeds the risk and occurs frequently in patients exposed to the effects of immobility. At the same time, it will guide the results pursued in the care plan and the application of the respective nursing and interdisciplinary interventions that favor the reduction of the complications derived from disuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.