Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529963›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

TASRIC: A Type-Aware Semantic Retrieval Augmentation Framework With Iterative Correction for Bias Mitigation.

Chenyang Li, Maoyuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenyang LiFaculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3556-9542
Maoyuan ZhangHubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Learning, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China 24BTQ054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender bias in Chinese natural language processing poses significant challenges due to its high degree of metaphorical expression and strong dependence on contextual cues. Existing approaches typically rely on fixed demonstrations or one-shot generation strategies, which may result in incomplete debiasing or loss of core semantics when handling metaphorical and long-tail biased expressions. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a type-aware semantic retrieval augmentation framework with iterative correction (TASRIC), a semi-parametric generative framework for mitigating bias. First, we construct a unified fine-grained recognizer based on adversarial training to enable robust fine-grained bias identification. Second, we introduce a type-aware semantic retrieval augmentation mechanism that leverages bias type information and dynamic semantic retrieval to impose contextual constraints, thereby alleviating the insufficient coverage of fixed demonstration prompts in complex metaphorical bias scenarios. Finally, an iterative correction strategy is designed to ensure general semantic preservation during the debiasing process. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared with a few-shot ChatGPT baseline, TASRIC improves the quality of debiased text generation by 3.7% in BLEU, an n-gram overlap metric, and 3.3% in METEOR, a metric that considers more flexible lexical matching.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language Modelsbias mitigationfine‐grained recognitioniterative correctionretrieval augmentation

Identifiers

PMID42529963
PMCPMC13419922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.