ArticleVeterinary surgery : VS2026
Technical note on cervical epidural catheterization in two adult horses: Injectate distribution and epidural space effects.
Article in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the caudalmost extent of diffusion of contrast media administered through a cervical epidural catheter (CEC) and to describe pathologic changes associated with maintaining an indwelling CEC for up to 17 days. STUDY
designPilot study. ANIMALS: Two mature horses.
methodsCECs were placed under ultrasound guidance in two horses. Both horses were injected with 5 mL 50% Iohexol contrast solution, followed by radiographs of catheter insertion site to confirm placement. A total volume of 15 mL contrast solution was injected in 5 mL aliquots up to 25 min post-initial injection. Laterolateral radiographs were taken every 5 min post-initial 5 mL injection in the caudal cervical region. Horses were euthanized 16 or 17 days after placement of an indwelling CEC and the area surrounding the catheter was examined using gross necropsy.
resultsIn one horse, cranial C6 was reached at 25 min following 15 mL of contrast solution. In the other horse, cranial C6 was reached at 1 min following 5 mL of contrast solution. The caudalmost extent of contrast solution was reached after 15 mL and 20-25 min. Grossly, areas of mild inflammation and fibrosis were identified in the epidural space surrounding the catheters at 16-17 days post-catheter placement.
conclusionThese results indicate that a 10-15 mL volume of contrast solution can reach the cranial extent of the brachial plexus. Indwelling CECs at days 16 and 17 displayed similar findings on gross necropsy to those previously described for sacrococcygeal and lumbosacral epidural catheters. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Further studies are warranted to assess the effect of the medical treatment of lesions in the caudal cervical vertebrae of horses through administration via cervical epidural catheters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.