Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529903›Full record

GuidelineClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2026

Hospital-Based Food Challenges for the Diagnosis of Food Allergy-A BSACI Clinical Practice Statement.

I J Skypala, H B Ball, C Gore, K Sooriyakumar, D Stevens, V Patil, A Elghoudi, J Dempsey, S Blamires, K Wright and 7 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

I J SkypalaRoyal Brompton & Harefield Hospital-Part of Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-4293
H B BallUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
C GoreSection of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-5129
K SooriyakumarRoyal Victoria Infirmary, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
D StevensRoyal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Treliske, Truro, UK.
V PatilUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
A ElghoudiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-6152
J DempseySection of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6589-0501
S BlamiresSection of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9390-271X
K WrightUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-5051
K StoenchevRoyal Brompton & Harefield Hospital-Part of Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
M DoyleHealth and Community Services, General Hospital, St Helier, Jersey.
N GunawardanaCambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9112-461X
L SiewGuys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-939X
R KnibbDepartment of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-0904
J EdmondsImmunology & Allergy Department, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8769-9251
N PatelSection of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-9411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food challenges play an important role in the diagnosis and management of food hypersensitivity. Although the gold-standard is the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, an open challenge, where the challenge food is known to both the patient and the allergy team, is a practical and effective tool for use in daily clinical practice. A food challenge can help determine the presence or absence of a food allergy if the history and allergy tests are discordant, or if resolution of the allergy is expected. The outcome of a food challenge can result in either confident introduction or re-introduction of foods or provide clarity on which foods or forms of the food need to be avoided. Challenges can be a positive or negative experience for individuals; to maximise the potential for positive impact, food challenges should be overseen by individuals with relevant knowledge, skills and experience, and take place in a suitable clinical area with appropriate access to emergency support and a pathway for admission to an inpatient facility. Challenge foods should be age-specific, in an appropriate form (uncooked, cooked, baked, composite food), and given in incrementally increasing amounts until an age-specific top or cumulative dose has been consumed. The decision to pause or stop a challenge should be based on international guidance and clinician judgement, but also consider an individual's symptom history and their preferences.

Indexed as

AllergensFoodFood HypersensitivityHumansAllergens

Identifiers

PMID42529903
PMCPMC13532939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.