ReviewStroke2026
Optimizing Acute Ischemic Stroke Systems of Care: Current State and Future Directions.
Review in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite significant progress in hospital quality initiatives and the organization of regional stroke systems of care, a significant gap persists between the number of patients eligible for acute ischemic stroke reperfusion therapies and those who receive them in a timely manner. This gap reflects persistent delays and variability across the prehospital and interhospital phases of care, from prehospital dispatch and field assessment to destination selection and interhospital transfer workflows. This expert narrative review synthesizes current evidence on acute stroke systems of care, with a particular focus on prehospital identification of stroke, destination decision-making for suspected large-vessel occlusion, and interhospital transfer for patients requiring endovascular thrombectomy. Key processes, including prehospital response and scene times, destination decision-making, and door-in-door-out metrics, are examined to illustrate how system-level bottlenecks affect access to and outcomes of reperfusion therapies. Emerging and novel technologies are also described, including mobile stroke units, blood-based biomarkers for prehospital stroke diagnosis, portable neuroimaging modalities, physiological and device-based detection systems, and cross-cutting tools such as telestroke, all aimed at shifting accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions earlier in the stroke care pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.