ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2026
Estimated cardiac deaths associated with treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia with ibrutinib versus zanubrutinib in the United States.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the absence of real-world comparative studies of cardiac death risk, this study estimates the potential reduction in cardiac mortality associated with treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with zanubrutinib instead of ibrutinib in first-line (1L) or second-line or later (2L+) in the United States (US).
methodsNumber needed to treat (NNT) for incremental cardiac death with ibrutinib versus zanubrutinib was applied to real-world ibrutinib utilization from Symphony over 5 years (2020-2024). Primary analysis utilized head-to-head cardiac death risks from ALPINE (2L+). An exploratory 1L analysis utilized indirect comparisons from SEQUOIA and RESONATE-2. Sensitivity analyses assessed cardiac death risk with 10+ years of ibrutinib utilization (2014-2024).
resultsIn 2L+ CLL, NNT for incremental cardiac death was 54 patients. Based on real-world ibrutinib use, 81 cardiac deaths could potentially have been avoided with zanubrutinib over 5 years. The exploratory 1L CLL NNT per cardiac death was 46, corresponding to 140 potentially avoidable deaths if patients were treated with zanubrutinib. Over a 10+ year period, the number of potentially avoidable deaths increased to 318 (2L+) and 489 (1L).
conclusionsThe NNT model suggests substantial cardiac death reductions if zanubrutinib were utilized instead of ibrutinib for CLL treatment in US practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.