Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529778›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026

Medial vs Central Upper Eyelid Fat: A Histological and Immunohistochemical Study of Structural and Vascular Features.

Lukas Prantl, Hanna Guice, Sophia-Theresa Diesch, Andreas Eigenberger, Christina Gottwald, Ana Cristina S R G Jorge, Rafael Loucas, Andrea Pagani, Kirsten Utpatel, Tom Schimanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lukas Prantl
Hanna Guice
Sophia-Theresa Diesch
Andreas Eigenberger
Christina Gottwald
Ana Cristina S R G Jorge
Rafael Loucas
Andrea Pagani
Kirsten Utpatel
Tom Schimanski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The medial upper eyelid fat compartment has long been recognized clinically as being firmer, whiter, and more fibrous than the central preaponeurotic fat. Despite its surgical relevance, systematic quantitative histological characterization remains limited. Objectives: The objective of this study was to quantitatively compare the histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of medial and central upper eyelid fat compartments, with particular focus on connective tissue composition, vascularization, and stromal nuclear density. Methods: In a paired-sample design, medial and central upper eyelid fat compartments were harvested from 10 patients undergoing upper blepharoplasty. Each compartment was analyzed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, acid fuchsin + orange G staining, and CD31 immunohistochemistry. Connective tissue proportion, capillary density, and stromal nuclear density were assessed. Results: The medial compartment demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of connective tissue compared with the central compartment (67.74 ± 5.63% vs 56.63 ± 5.56%, Conclusions: The medial upper eyelid fat compartment differs histologically from the central compartment by an increased connective tissue content and reduced vascular and stromal cell density. These findings provide a structural basis for its clinically observed firmness and potentially altered regenerative behavior.

Identifiers

PMID42529778
PMCPMC13419067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.