Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529755›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Cardiology hospital admission risk prediction: training, internal validation and technical implementation in the electronic health record.

Jasper L Selder, Olivier V Witteman, Oscar M van der Meer, Machteld J Boonstra, Stephan van der Zwaard, Folkert W Asselbergs, Marlies P Schijven, Albert C van Rossum, Cornelis P Allaart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jasper L SelderDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0777-491X
Olivier V WittemanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oscar M van der MeerDepartment of ICT, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Machteld J BoonstraDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephan van der ZwaardDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8296-828X
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marlies P SchijvenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-0116
Albert C van RossumDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis P AllaartDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Rising healthcare demand is increasingly outpacing available outpatient capacity in cardiology, where follow-up is often scheduled at fixed intervals despite substantial variation in individual patient risk. This uniform follow-up approach contributes to high outpatient workload and inefficient use of clinical resources. Accurate risk estimation using routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data may support more individualized follow-up planning by identifying patients at very low risk of mortality or unplanned hospitalization, in whom follow-up intervals could be safely extended. Methods and results: We developed and validated a machine-learning model as part of the Cardiology Hospital Admission Risk Prediction (CHARP) program. The retrospective baseline cohort comprised 307 792 outpatient visits from 52 989 unique patients at Amsterdam UMC. The primary endpoint was a composite of unplanned cardiac hospitalization or all-cause death within 2 years; the 1-year composite endpoint served as a secondary outcome. Model development and validation were performed in a filtered, leakage-safe prediction cohort using gradient-boosted decision trees (XGBoost) with strict patient-level GroupKFold cross-validation. All predictions and performance metrics were retrospectively evaluated at the outpatient visit (trigger) level. Retrospective model performance was assessed using AUROC, AUPRC, Brier score, calibration curves, and SHAP-based explainability. The final model was technically deployed within the electronic health record to allow automated, visit-level risk estimation in a prospective silent-running environment. In the filtered prediction cohort (199 961 visits), the 2-year composite endpoint prevalence was 16.8%. Across five cross-validation folds, the CHARP model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.77 ± 0.00 and AUPRC of 0.42 ± 0.01, with a Brier score of 0.12, indicating strong overall discrimination and good calibration. Key predictors included NT-proBNP, renal function indices, prior hospitalizations, and cardiac function measures. The deployed CHARP pipeline successfully generated daily risk predictions for all scheduled cardiology outpatients in the EHR environment throughout the silent-running period. Conclusion: This study shows that machine-learning applied to routine EHR data can deliver clinically meaningful, visit-level risk stratification for cardiology outpatients. The successful EHR integration of CHARP enables prospective evaluation of data-driven follow-up strategies aimed at reducing outpatient clinic burden through safe de-intensification of follow-up for low-risk patients.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)Cardiology outpatientsClinical decision supportElectronic health recordHospital admission risk predictionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42529755
PMCPMC13419068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.