Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Systems and policy factors affecting service delivery for homeless adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Whitney Thurman, Elizabeth Heitkemper, Tara Hutson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Whitney ThurmanSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Elizabeth HeitkemperSchool of Nursing, Biobehavioral Nursing & Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Tara HutsonSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) is characterized by impairment of cognitive function that results in daily living limitations. Adults with IDD face barriers to meeting basic needs and must navigate multiple public systems to access services. The housing affordability crisis has contributed to a disproportionate overrepresentation of adults with IDD who experience homelessness. Little evidence has articulated the unique systems- and policy-level issues facing homeless adults with IDD. Objective: The purpose of this study was to 1) map the systems with which adults with IDD who experience homelessness must interface in order to access needed services and 2) describe the systems- and policy-level issues impacting service delivery and care coordination of this population. Methods: This qualitative study interviewed professionals providing disability, homeless, and/or social care services to adults experiencing homelessness between March and June 2021. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Participants ( Conclusion: Homeless adults with IDD exist in a nearly perpetual process of cycling through public systems, and health equity cannot be attained without attention to the structural ableism that is embedded throughout. Findings highlight the importance of moving away from a crisis-driven model of care to a cohesive care ecosystem, and future research is needed to develop and test models of care that eliminate system churn so that all individuals are supported.

Indexed as

care coordinationhomelessnesspublic policysystem churnsystems

Identifiers

PMID42529582
PMCPMC13418228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.