Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529554›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

From rhetoric to reality: an empirical audit of athlete-centred governance in the Toronto 2015 Pan/Parapan American games.

Nicole Wendy Forrester, Eric MacIntosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole Wendy ForresterRTA School of Media, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eric MacIntoshSchool of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary mega-sport events (MSEs), athlete-centred governance has become a dominant rhetorical commitment, yet it is often operationalized through service delivery rather than formal governance structures. Within the stakeholder identification and salience framework, athletes are typically positioned as dependent stakeholders, characterized by high legitimacy and urgency but limited formal power. Despite functioning as prosumers, athletes rarely possess meaningful decision-making authority. This study examines athlete-centred governance by assessing whether the formal integration of an Athlete Advisory Council (AAC) within an MSE is associated with athlete satisfaction. Using a cross-sectional, field-based design, this study examines the Toronto 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games. A total of 829 athletes representing 42 sports and 29 countries completed the athlete experience questionnaire (AEQ). Strong internal consistency was observed (Cronbach's

Indexed as

athlete-centredathlete experienceathlete satisfactionexperiential paritymega-sport eventprosumersport governancestakeholder salience

Identifiers

PMID42529554
PMCPMC13417784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.