ArticleJSES international2026
Artificial intelligence-based quantitative computed tomography assessment of shoulder muscle and its association with outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration of the shoulder muscles are known to influence clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Although quantitative evaluation of rotator cuff muscles has been increasingly reported, most previous studies have focused on intrinsic muscles and relied on two-dimensional or manual assessment methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate shoulder muscle volume and composition using an artificial intelligence-based automated segmentation method on pre-operative computed tomography (CT) images and to investigate their associations with post-operative range of motion (ROM) after rTSA. Methods: This retrospective study included 13 patients (14 shoulders) who underwent rTSA for cuff tear arthropathy and related conditions with a minimum post-operative follow-up of 1 year. Pre-operative CT scans with 1-mm slice thickness were obtained within four weeks before surgery. Shoulder muscles, including intrinsic and extrinsic muscles, were automatically segmented using a deep learning-based model. Muscle volume and composition-functional muscle (FM), low-attenuation muscle, and adipose tissue (AT)-were quantified and normalized to scapular bone volume. Associations between muscle parameters and post-operative active ROM were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Results: The supraspinatus (SSP) exhibited a higher proportion of AT, possibly reflecting fatty infiltration, and was the only muscle showing a relatively balanced distribution of FM, low-attenuation muscle, and AT. The proportion of FM in the SSP was positively associated with active anterior elevation (AE), whereas the proportion of AT in the SSP and subscapularis (SSc) was negatively associated with active AE. In addition, total deltoid muscle volume and FM volume of the SSP were positively associated with post-operative AE. The AT volume of the SSc were negatively associated with active AE. No significant associations were identified between muscle composition or volume and post-operative external rotation. Conclusion: Artificial intelligence-based automated segmentation on pre-operative CT enabled detailed quantitative assessment of shoulder muscle volume and composition. Post-operative ROM tended to be associated with the deltoid, SSP, and SSc. Although these findings should be interpreted with caution due to limited statistical power, this exploratory feasibility study provides preliminary insights and may serve as a basis for future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.