ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Skeleton-based rehabilitation movement quality classification: a leakage-controlled benchmark on IntelliRehabDS.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Automated, objective assessment of rehabilitation movement quality from three-dimensional skeleton recordings can support scalable and low-cost physiotherapy monitoring, but reported performance is often affected by subject leakage, inconsistent class-imbalance handling and non-comparable evaluation protocols. Methods: This study establishes a leakage-controlled, subject-independent benchmark on the publicly available IntelliRehabDS corpus. After removing 12 ambiguous-label files and 2 sequences shorter than 16 frames, 2,575 sequences from 29 adult and adolescent participants were retained, comprising 2,047 correct and 528 incorrect executions across nine rehabilitation gestures. Sequences were root-centred, torso-scaled, smoothed with a Savitzky-Golay filter, resampled to 64 frames and represented through kinematic features or skeleton tensors. Five classical feature-based learners and the topology-aware ST-SkelNet sequence model were evaluated through nested subject-wise cross-validation. Scaling and SMOTE were fitted only within the relevant training partitions for the classical models, whereas ST-SkelNet used class-weighted binary cross-entropy. Results: Performance was reported using fold-averaged metrics, pooled out-of-fold confusion matrices and ROC-AUC analysis. No single model dominated: the multilayer perceptron achieved the highest accuracy (0.869), the random forest the highest ROC-AUC (0.861), and the support vector machine the highest incorrect-class recall (0.629). ST-SkelNet achieved 0.846 accuracy, 0.855 ROC-AUC and 0.612 incorrect-class recall, but did not consistently exceed the strongest classical baselines. Head-motion and bilateral-asymmetry features showed descriptive separation between correct and incorrect executions in this adult/adolescent cohort. Discussion: The contribution is a reproducible methodological benchmark rather than a clinical system or a state-of-the-art architecture. IntelliRehabDS is treated here as a surrogate adult/adolescent dataset for methodological validation and benchmarking, not as infant data. Transfer to paediatric populations, including congenital muscular torticollis, requires independently collected age-specific data and prospective clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.