ReviewInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases2026
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Oropharyngeal, Esophageal, and Oral Candidiasis in HIV-Positive Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Oropharyngeal, Esophageal, and Oral Candidiasis in HIV-Positive Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral, oropharyngeal, and esophageal candidiasis are common forms of mucosal candidiasis (MC) in people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (PLWHA). Despite differences in infection sites, oral, oropharyngeal, and esophageal candidiasis share common pathophysiological mechanisms, including etiologic agents, host susceptibility, and antibiotic use. Identifying prevalence and risk factors associated with these types of candidiasis in this population enables clinicians to manage these infections across the affected mucosal sites effectively. Objective: To synthesize the global prevalence and identify the risk factors for oral, oropharyngeal, and esophageal candidiasis in PLWHA. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane and extracted the prevalence data and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for each risk factor associated with MC. We calculated pooled ORs for risk factors present in a minimum of two studies. Results: Fifteen studies were included. The overall prevalence of MC in PLWHA was 39.0% (95% CI: 27%-52%; Conclusions: The global overall prevalence of MC in PLHWA was 39%. Risk factors, including male gender, CD4 count, and HAART, are shown to have significant effects on the development of MC in PLWHA. The results highlighted the significance of promptly recognizing and addressing these risk factors to reduce the incidence of MC in PLWHA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.