Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529396›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Beyond the victim: experienced and observed workplace violence, violence prevention, and job dissatisfaction.

Emily Belew, Madelynn Stackhouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily BelewDepartment of Management, Bryan School of Business and Economics, UNC Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.
Madelynn StackhouseDepartment of Management, Bryan School of Business and Economics, UNC Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Workplace violence rarely only affects its direct victims; it is often witnessed, remembered, and silently interpreted by many others. This study explores the impacts of experienced and observed violence on job dissatisfaction and the mediating effects of perceived lack of organizational violence prevention (LOVP). Methods: Data were drawn from a nationally representative sample of 14,515 federal employees. Structural equation modeling was used to test direct, indirect, and comparative effects. Results and discussion: The results indicated that first-person and observed third-person violence result in job dissatisfaction. Interestingly, the contrast between first-person (experienced) and third-person (observed) violence on job dissatisfaction is negligible. Both exposure types have significant total effects (0.47 versus 0.33), respectively, but the difference is non-significant (

Indexed as

job attitudesjob satisfactionpsychological contract violationtransgressionsworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID42529396
PMCPMC13417679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.